Free Consultation: 858.450.1040 Payment | Client Login

MENUMENU
  • EDD
  • IRS
    • IRS Notices – What They Mean
  • About Us
    • MEET THE TEAM
    • PRACTICE AREAS
    • CONTACT US
  • TAX LAW & EDD RESOURCES
    • SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS TAX LAW GUIDE
    • EDD & IRS AUDITS
    • CRIMINAL TAX
    • SAN DIEGO TAX ATTORNEY
    • Orange County Tax Attorney Services
    • TAX BALANCE
    • INNOCENT SPOUSE RELIEF
    • OTHER TAX LAW MATTERS
    • SALES TAX AUDITS
    • UNFILED TAX RETURNS
    • OFFERS IN COMPROMISE
    • CALIFORNIA INCOME TAXES
    • INTERNATIONAL TAX
    • TAX COLLECTIONS
    • CORPORATE | BUSINESS TAX
    • PAYROLL TAX AUDITS
    • TAX LEIN
    • FAQs
  • SBA Loan Resources
    • PPP FORGIVENESS DENIAL APPEAL
    • SBA Criminal Defense
    • FAQs
  • RESOURCES
    • Blog
    • VIDEO LIBRARY
Home > COVID-19 > Commentary on NY Times Article, “California Sues Uber and Lyft, Claiming Workers Are Misclassified”

Commentary on NY Times Article, “California Sues Uber and Lyft, Claiming Workers Are Misclassified”

May 11, 2020

California Sues Uber and Lyft, Claiming Workers Are Misclassified. In January, 2020 Assembly Bill AB-5 went into effect redefining the criteria for a 1099 contract worker as opposed to a W-2 employee. The bill was aimed at the employers who drive the Gig Economy and in the subsequent months, Uber, Lyft and Door Dash poured 10s of millions of dollars into combatting the law. Last week California's Attorney General and the Attorneys General of San Francisco and Los Angeles together filed suit against Uber and Lyft claiming that their workers are misclassified and they must pay $2,500 per misclassified worker for their violation of AB-5's criteria.

To review: AB-5 states that, in order for a worker to be classified as a 1099 contract worker and not an employee, the worker: 1. must be free from time and financial control of the hirer 2. must perform work outside the core function of the hiring entity's function and 3. must have their own business entity. It appears that the timing of this lawsuit is driven by budgetary concerns as the State of CA has seen apx 4M people file for unemployment during the Coronavirus pandemic.

Lyft responded by saying they would cooperate with the AG and find a solution. Uber responded in a more aggressive way saying they would prefer to take the issue to court. The New York Times article does note that, "Uber and Lyft have reported that they have substantial cash reserves to weather the downturn caused by the pandemic. Uber said it had more than $8 billion, while Lyft said it had more than $2 billion.". It remains to be seen what will happen with the suit against the largest Gig Economy companies.

For the small business, this serves as a warning that, despite the fact that many people are out of work and may want to seek employment as contract workers as they wait for a new position in their chose career fields, California EDD will not soon be relaxing the stringent criteria for classification as a 1099. Business owners beware: your classifications must be air tight to avoid EDD audit. If you have questions about your worker classification, reach out to the experts at MIlikowsky Tax Law. We have defended employers who have been audited by EDD, accurately conveying their company's situation to the government and saving money, and time as well as saving businesses from serious financial hardship associated with 1099 reclassification, including fines and back taxes they would have owed if not for our detailed defense.

Filed Under: Blog, COVID-19, News Tagged With: 1099, AB-5, Audits, Business Owners, CA EDD, California EDD, Coronavirus, COVID-19, NY Times

Archives

Search

Categories

Questions About
Tax Audit/Controversies?

A representative will be in contact within 1 business day
PRIVACY POLICY

Get Monthly Updates on Important Tax Law Matters



Milikowsky Tax Law is located at: 4250 Executive Square, Ste. 650, La Jolla, CA 92037
o. (858) 450-1040 | m. (858) 212-0542 |
Privacy Policy

DISCLAIMER:
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Milikowsky Tax Law © All Rights Reserved. Clear1099.com | Cal1099.com | California1099.com © All Rights Reserved.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT